Demographics details for Lancaster, OH vs New haven, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, OH vs New haven, CT.
| Data | Lancaster | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,174 | 138,915 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $52,716 | $54,305 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs New haven
- The population in New haven is higher at 138,915, compared to 41,174 in Lancaster.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 31.0 years in New haven.
- New haven has a higher median income of $54,305, compared to $52,716 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 34.0% compared to 21.0% in New haven.
- The poverty level is higher in New haven at 19%, compared to 12% in Lancaster.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in New haven.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs New haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 29 |
| White | 92 | 27 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs New haven
- In New haven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 27% in New haven.
- In New haven, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Lancaster.
- New haven has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New haven at 9%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and New haven at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 46.7% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs New haven
- More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.0% in New haven.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 26.1% compared to 19.8% in New haven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 23.5% compared to 19.2% in New haven.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 19.2% compared to 13.0% in New haven.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 46.7% compared to 37.4% in New haven.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in New haven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (125) | 1.2% (1,674) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (10,487) | 15.7% (21,744) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (4,399) | 15.1% (20,913) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (5,740) | 23.5% (32,679) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs New haven
- In New haven, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 15.7% in New haven.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New haven at 15.1%, compared to 10.7% in Lancaster.
- In New haven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.5% compared to 13.9% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.