Demographics details for Lancaster, OH vs Manassas park, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, OH vs Manassas park, VA.

Data Lancaster Manassas park
Population 41,174 16,703
Median Age 38.4 years 35.8 years
Median Income $52,716 $91,673
Married Families 34.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 12% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 2.7

Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Manassas park

  • In Lancaster, the population is higher at 41,174, compared to 16,703 in Manassas park.
  • Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 35.8 years in Manassas park.
  • Manassas park has a higher median income of $91,673, compared to $52,716 in Lancaster.
  • In Manassas park, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Manassas park.
  • The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 5.2%, compared to 2.7% in Manassas park.

Demographics

Demographics Lancaster vs Manassas park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lancaster Manassas park
Black 1 15
White 92 16
Asian 1 11
Hispanic 2 43
Two or More Races 4 12
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Manassas park

  • In Manassas park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 16% in Manassas park.
  • In Manassas park, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Lancaster.
  • Manassas park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Manassas park at 12%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
  • In Manassas park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Lancaster.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lancaster Manassas park
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 10.7%
Depression 26.1% 20.0%
Smoking 23.5% 14.6%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 16.7%
Obesity 46.7% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Manassas park

  • More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.4% in Manassas park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 26.1% compared to 20.0% in Manassas park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 23.5% compared to 14.6% in Manassas park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 19.2% compared to 16.7% in Manassas park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 46.7% compared to 36.6% in Manassas park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Manassas park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lancaster Manassas park
No Schooling 0.3% (125) 6.2% (1,032)
High School Diploma 25.5% (10,487) 18.3% (3,054)
Less than High School 10.7% (4,399) 25.9% (4,321)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.9% (5,740) 17.0% (2,847)

Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Manassas park

  • In Manassas park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.3% in Lancaster.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 18.3% in Manassas park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manassas park at 25.9%, compared to 10.7% in Lancaster.
  • In Manassas park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 13.9% in Lancaster.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.