Demographics details for Lancaster, OH vs Junction city, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, OH vs Junction city, KY.

Data Lancaster Junction city
Population 41,174 2,290
Median Age 38.4 years 41.6 years
Median Income $52,716 $38,646
Married Families 34.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 12% 15%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.0

Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Junction city

  • In Lancaster, the population is higher at 41,174, compared to 2,290 in Junction city.
  • The median age in Junction city is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 38.4 years in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has a higher median income of $52,716 compared to $38,646 in Junction city.
  • In Junction city, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Lancaster.
  • The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 12% in Lancaster.
  • The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Junction city.

Demographics

Demographics Lancaster vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lancaster Junction city
Black 1 2
White 92 79
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 7
Two or More Races 4 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 79% in Junction city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 1% compared to 0% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 12%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Junction city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lancaster Junction city
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 20.0%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 14.8%
Depression 26.1% 29.5%
Smoking 23.5% 23.5%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 15.1%
Obesity 46.7% 41.2%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 27.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 19.1% in Lancaster.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Junction city at 29.5% versus 26.1% in Lancaster.
  • Smoking rates are the same in both Lancaster and Junction city at 23.5%.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 19.2% compared to 15.1% in Junction city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 46.7% compared to 41.2% in Junction city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Junction city at 27.0% compared to 19.0% in Lancaster.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lancaster Junction city
No Schooling 0.3% (125) 1.6% (37)
High School Diploma 25.5% (10,487) 23.9% (547)
Less than High School 10.7% (4,399) 18.0% (412)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.9% (5,740) 9.2% (211)

Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Lancaster.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 23.9% in Junction city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Junction city at 18.0%, compared to 10.7% in Lancaster.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 9.2% in Junction city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.