Demographics details for Lancaster, OH vs Forest park, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, OH vs Forest park, GA.
| Data | Lancaster | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,174 | 19,400 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $52,716 | $41,837 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Forest park
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 41,174, compared to 19,400 in Forest park.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $52,716 compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 34.0% compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Forest park.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Forest park.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Forest park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 55 |
| White | 92 | 8 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Forest park
- In Forest park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- In Forest park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Lancaster.
- Forest park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest park at 8%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Forest park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 46.7% | 43.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Forest park
- More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.3% in Forest park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 26.1% compared to 17.8% in Forest park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 23.5% compared to 22.7% in Forest park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 19.2% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 46.7% compared to 43.0% in Forest park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Forest park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (125) | 2.6% (504) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (10,487) | 18.4% (3,567) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (4,399) | 21.7% (4,202) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (5,740) | 6.4% (1,235) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Forest park
- In Forest park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.3% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 18.4% in Forest park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest park at 21.7%, compared to 10.7% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.