Demographics details for Lancaster, OH vs Aulander, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, OH vs Aulander, NC.
| Data | Lancaster | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,174 | 727 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $52,716 | $33,250 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Aulander
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 41,174, compared to 727 in Aulander.
- The median age in Aulander is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 38.4 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $52,716 compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 34.0% compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
- The poverty level is higher in Aulander at 14%, compared to 12% in Lancaster.
- Aulander has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 5.2% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Aulander provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 61 |
| White | 92 | 38 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Aulander
- In Aulander, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 38% in Aulander.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 1% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 2% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 4% compared to 1% in Aulander.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Aulander at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 46.7% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Aulander
- In Aulander, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 19.1% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 26.1% compared to 23.5% in Aulander.
- Aulander has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 23.5% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 19.2% compared to 14.2% in Aulander.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 46.7% compared to 44.9% in Aulander.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Aulander.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (125) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (10,487) | 13.3% (97) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (4,399) | 28.5% (207) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (5,740) | 2.9% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Aulander
- In Aulander, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 13.3% in Aulander.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aulander at 28.5%, compared to 10.7% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 2.9% in Aulander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.