Demographics details for Lancaster, CA vs Toledo, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, CA vs Toledo, OR.
| Data | Lancaster | Toledo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 169,185 | 3,541 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 41.6 years |
| Median Income | $71,367 | $46,477 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Toledo
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 169,185, compared to 3,541 in Toledo.
- The median age in Toledo is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367 compared to $46,477 in Toledo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 32.0% compared to 30.0% in Toledo.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Toledo.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 8.2%, compared to 3.5% in Toledo.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Toledo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Toledo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | Data is updating |
| White | 10 | 76 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 46 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Toledo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 21% compared to 0% in Toledo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Toledo at 76% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 4% compared to 0% in Toledo.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 46% compared to 13% in Toledo.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 18% compared to 10% in Toledo.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Toledo at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Toledo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 29.1% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Toledo
- In Toledo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Toledo at 29.1% versus 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Toledo has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Toledo at 18.1% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Toledo has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Toledo at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Toledo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (3,403) | 1.0% (36) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (29,555) | 14.8% (525) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (36,421) | 16.2% (572) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (20,861) | 20.0% (707) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Toledo
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.0% in Toledo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 14.8% in Toledo.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 16.2% in Toledo.
- In Toledo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.