Demographics details for Lancaster, CA vs New milford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, CA vs New milford, CT.
Data | Lancaster | New milford |
---|---|---|
Population | 169,185 | 7,095 |
Median Age | 33.6 years | 41.0 years |
Median Income | $71,367 | $70,625 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs New milford
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 169,185, compared to 7,095 in New milford.
- The median age in New milford is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367 compared to $70,625 in New milford.
- In New milford, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 7% in New milford.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 8.2%, compared to 3.5% in New milford.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs New milford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lancaster | New milford |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 4 |
White | 10 | 76 |
Asian | 4 | 4 |
Hispanic | 46 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 18 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs New milford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 21% compared to 4% in New milford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New milford at 76% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- Both Lancaster and New milford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 46% compared to 10% in New milford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 18% compared to 6% in New milford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lancaster at 1% compared to 0% in New milford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lancaster | New milford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 9.2% |
Depression | 17.7% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 13.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 27.2% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs New milford
- More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.8% in New milford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New milford at 22.1% versus 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 14.8% compared to 13.2% in New milford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New milford at 17.1% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 32.9% compared to 27.2% in New milford.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Lancaster and New milford at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lancaster | New milford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (3,403) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.5% (29,555) | 21.6% (1,531) |
Less than High School | 21.5% (36,421) | 10.0% (710) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (20,861) | 23.4% (1,658) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs New milford
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in New milford.
- In New milford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 10.0% in New milford.
- In New milford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.