Demographics details for Lancaster, CA vs Madisonville, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, CA vs Madisonville, KY.

Data Lancaster Madisonville
Population 169,185 19,214
Median Age 33.6 years 37.3 years
Median Income $71,367 $54,234
Married Families 32.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 15% 14%
Unemployment Rate 8.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Madisonville

  • In Lancaster, the population is higher at 169,185, compared to 19,214 in Madisonville.
  • The median age in Madisonville is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367 compared to $54,234 in Madisonville.
  • In Madisonville, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Madisonville.
  • The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 8.2%, compared to 3.5% in Madisonville.

Demographics

Demographics Lancaster vs Madisonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lancaster Madisonville
Black 21 12
White 10 75
Asian 4 1
Hispanic 46 4
Two or More Races 18 7
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Madisonville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 21% compared to 12% in Madisonville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Madisonville at 75% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 4% compared to 1% in Madisonville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 46% compared to 4% in Madisonville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 18% compared to 7% in Madisonville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Madisonville at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lancaster Madisonville
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 19.6%
Physical Health Not Good 13.5% 14.9%
Depression 17.7% 27.8%
Smoking 14.8% 23.8%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 14.3%
Obesity 32.9% 41.7%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Madisonville

  • In Madisonville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Madisonville at 27.8% versus 17.7% in Lancaster.
  • Madisonville has a higher smoking rate at 23.8% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 15.1% compared to 14.3% in Madisonville.
  • Madisonville has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Madisonville at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lancaster Madisonville
No Schooling 2.0% (3,403) 0.7% (126)
High School Diploma 17.5% (29,555) 18.4% (3,529)
Less than High School 21.5% (36,421) 13.0% (2,491)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.3% (20,861) 14.0% (2,694)

Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Madisonville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.7% in Madisonville.
  • In Madisonville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
  • More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 13.0% in Madisonville.
  • In Madisonville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.0% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.