Demographics details for Lancaster, CA vs Leesburg, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, CA vs Leesburg, VA.
| Data | Lancaster | Leesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 169,185 | 48,974 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $71,367 | $132,298 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Leesburg
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 169,185, compared to 48,974 in Leesburg.
- The median age in Leesburg is higher at 34.8 years, compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Leesburg has a higher median income of $132,298, compared to $71,367 in Lancaster.
- In Leesburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 6% in Leesburg.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 8.2%, compared to 2.8% in Leesburg.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Leesburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Leesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | 10 |
| White | 10 | 50 |
| Asian | 4 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 46 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Leesburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 21% compared to 10% in Leesburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Leesburg at 50% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- In Leesburg, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 4% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 46% compared to 17% in Leesburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 18% compared to 12% in Leesburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Leesburg at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Leesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 18.6% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 33.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Leesburg
- More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.1% in Leesburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Leesburg at 18.6% versus 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 14.8% compared to 10.7% in Leesburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Leesburg at 17.7% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Leesburg has higher obesity rates at 33.4% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Leesburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Leesburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (3,403) | 0.8% (376) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (29,555) | 8.6% (4,195) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (36,421) | 7.4% (3,619) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (20,861) | 36.0% (17,628) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Leesburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.8% in Leesburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 8.6% in Leesburg.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 7.4% in Leesburg.
- In Leesburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.