Demographics details for Lancaster, CA vs Franklinton, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, CA vs Franklinton, LA.
Data | Lancaster | Franklinton |
---|---|---|
Population | 169,185 | 3,593 |
Median Age | 33.6 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $71,367 | $31,645 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Franklinton
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 169,185, compared to 3,593 in Franklinton.
- The median age in Franklinton is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367 compared to $31,645 in Franklinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 32.0% compared to 26.0% in Franklinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Franklinton at 19%, compared to 15% in Lancaster.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 8.2%, compared to 4.0% in Franklinton.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Franklinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lancaster | Franklinton |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 54 |
White | 10 | 41 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 46 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 18 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Franklinton
- In Franklinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 54% compared to 21% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Franklinton at 41% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 4% compared to 0% in Franklinton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 46% compared to 1% in Franklinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 18% compared to 4% in Franklinton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lancaster at 1% compared to 0% in Franklinton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lancaster | Franklinton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 21.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 16.6% |
Depression | 17.7% | 25.8% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 27.5% |
Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 46.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 33.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Franklinton
- In Franklinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Franklinton at 25.8% versus 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Franklinton has a higher smoking rate at 27.5% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 15.1% compared to 14.8% in Franklinton.
- Franklinton has higher obesity rates at 46.9% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Franklinton at 33.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lancaster | Franklinton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (3,403) | 0.8% (30) |
High School Diploma | 17.5% (29,555) | 23.5% (844) |
Less than High School | 21.5% (36,421) | 20.5% (737) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (20,861) | 5.2% (187) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Franklinton
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.8% in Franklinton.
- In Franklinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 20.5% in Franklinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 5.2% in Franklinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.