Demographics details for Lancaster, CA vs Federalsburg, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, CA vs Federalsburg, MD.
Data | Lancaster | Federalsburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 169,185 | 2,806 |
Median Age | 33.6 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $71,367 | $33,511 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Federalsburg
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 169,185, compared to 2,806 in Federalsburg.
- The median age in Federalsburg is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367 compared to $33,511 in Federalsburg.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Lancaster and Federalsburg at 32.0%.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Federalsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 8.2%, compared to 4.5% in Federalsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Federalsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lancaster | Federalsburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 47 |
White | 10 | 38 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 46 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 18 | 10 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Federalsburg
- In Federalsburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 47% compared to 21% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Federalsburg at 38% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 4% compared to 0% in Federalsburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 46% compared to 4% in Federalsburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 18% compared to 10% in Federalsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Federalsburg at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lancaster | Federalsburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 20.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 13.9% |
Depression | 17.7% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 22.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 12.8% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 47.3% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Federalsburg
- In Federalsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Federalsburg at 23.0% versus 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Federalsburg has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 15.1% compared to 12.8% in Federalsburg.
- Federalsburg has higher obesity rates at 47.3% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Federalsburg at 24.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lancaster | Federalsburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (3,403) | 1.5% (41) |
High School Diploma | 17.5% (29,555) | 24.5% (687) |
Less than High School | 21.5% (36,421) | 22.2% (624) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (20,861) | 4.7% (131) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Federalsburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.5% in Federalsburg.
- In Federalsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Federalsburg at 22.2%, compared to 21.5% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 4.7% in Federalsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.