Demographics details for Lancaster, CA vs Camden, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, CA vs Camden, TN.
Data | Lancaster | Camden |
---|---|---|
Population | 169,185 | 3,659 |
Median Age | 33.6 years | 43.3 years |
Median Income | $71,367 | $42,500 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Camden
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 169,185, compared to 3,659 in Camden.
- The median age in Camden is higher at 43.3 years, compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367 compared to $42,500 in Camden.
- In Camden, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Camden.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 8.2%, compared to 4.5% in Camden.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Camden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lancaster | Camden |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 4 |
White | 10 | 94 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 46 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 18 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Camden
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 21% compared to 4% in Camden.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Camden at 94% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 4% compared to 0% in Camden.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 46% compared to 0% in Camden.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 18% compared to 2% in Camden.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lancaster at 1% compared to 0% in Camden.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lancaster | Camden |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 21.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 15.1% |
Depression | 17.7% | 31.6% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 25.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 14.6% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 35.8% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Camden
- In Camden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Camden at 31.6% versus 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Camden has a higher smoking rate at 25.6% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 15.1% compared to 14.6% in Camden.
- Camden has higher obesity rates at 35.8% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Camden at 26.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lancaster | Camden |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (3,403) | 1.0% (37) |
High School Diploma | 17.5% (29,555) | 23.7% (868) |
Less than High School | 21.5% (36,421) | 19.6% (716) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (20,861) | 10.6% (389) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Camden
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.0% in Camden.
- In Camden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 19.6% in Camden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 10.6% in Camden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.