Demographics details for Lancaster, CA vs Baring, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, CA vs Baring, MO.
| Data | Lancaster | Baring |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 169,185 | 123 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $71,367 | $38,750 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 8.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Baring
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 169,185, compared to 123 in Baring.
- The median age in Baring is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367 compared to $38,750 in Baring.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 32.0% compared to 8.0% in Baring.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Baring.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 8.2%, compared to 3.5% in Baring.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Baring provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Baring |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | Data is updating |
| White | 10 | 100 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 46 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 18 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Baring
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 21% compared to 0% in Baring.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Baring at 100% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 4% compared to 0% in Baring.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 46% compared to 0% in Baring.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 18% compared to 0% in Baring.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lancaster at 1% compared to 0% in Baring.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Baring |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 25.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 2.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Baring
- In Baring, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Baring at 27.0% versus 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Baring has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Baring at 16.3% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Baring has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 10.0% compared to 2.0% in Baring.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Baring |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (3,403) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (29,555) | 12.2% (15) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (36,421) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (20,861) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Baring
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Baring.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 12.2% in Baring.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 0.0% in Baring.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 0.0% in Baring.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.