Demographics details for Lancaster, CA vs Amarillo, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, CA vs Amarillo, TX.

Data Lancaster Amarillo
Population 169,185 201,291
Median Age 33.6 years 34.4 years
Median Income $71,367 $60,628
Married Families 32.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 15% 14%
Unemployment Rate 8.2 3.4

Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Amarillo

  • The population in Amarillo is higher at 201,291, compared to 169,185 in Lancaster.
  • The median age in Amarillo is higher at 34.4 years, compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367 compared to $60,628 in Amarillo.
  • In Amarillo, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Amarillo.
  • The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 8.2%, compared to 3.4% in Amarillo.

Demographics

Demographics Lancaster vs Amarillo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lancaster Amarillo
Black 21 7
White 10 43
Asian 4 4
Hispanic 46 34
Two or More Races 18 11
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Amarillo

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 21% compared to 7% in Amarillo.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Amarillo at 43% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
  • Both Lancaster and Amarillo have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 46% compared to 34% in Amarillo.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 18% compared to 11% in Amarillo.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Amarillo at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lancaster Amarillo
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 18.2%
Physical Health Not Good 13.5% 12.7%
Depression 17.7% 23.5%
Smoking 14.8% 18.2%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 18.1%
Obesity 32.9% 39.7%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Amarillo

  • In Amarillo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Amarillo at 23.5% versus 17.7% in Lancaster.
  • Amarillo has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Amarillo at 18.1% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
  • Amarillo has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Amarillo at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lancaster Amarillo
No Schooling 2.0% (3,403) 1.7% (3,337)
High School Diploma 17.5% (29,555) 13.7% (27,602)
Less than High School 21.5% (36,421) 15.8% (31,837)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.3% (20,861) 16.1% (32,339)

Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Amarillo

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.7% in Amarillo.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 13.7% in Amarillo.
  • More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 15.8% in Amarillo.
  • In Amarillo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.