Demographics details for Lamesa, TX vs Wapakoneta, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lamesa, TX vs Wapakoneta, OH.
Data | Lamesa | Wapakoneta |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,425 | 9,776 |
Median Age | 33.1 years | 41.6 years |
Median Income | $39,434 | $63,008 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lamesa vs Wapakoneta
- The population in Wapakoneta is higher at 9,776, compared to 8,425 in Lamesa.
- The median age in Wapakoneta is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 33.1 years in Lamesa.
- Wapakoneta has a higher median income of $63,008, compared to $39,434 in Lamesa.
- In Wapakoneta, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 31.0% in Lamesa.
- Lamesa has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Wapakoneta.
- The unemployment rate in Lamesa is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Wapakoneta.
Demographics
Demographics Lamesa vs Wapakoneta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lamesa | Wapakoneta |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 5 | 89 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 73 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 19 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lamesa vs Wapakoneta
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lamesa at 3% compared to 1% in Wapakoneta.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wapakoneta at 89% compared to 5% in Lamesa.
- Both Lamesa and Wapakoneta have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lamesa at 73% compared to 5% in Wapakoneta.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lamesa at 19% compared to 5% in Wapakoneta.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lamesa and Wapakoneta at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lamesa | Wapakoneta |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 12.3% |
Depression | 24.0% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 21.6% | 21.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 41.2% | 38.8% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lamesa vs Wapakoneta
- More residents in Lamesa report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.1% in Wapakoneta.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lamesa at 24.0% compared to 23.8% in Wapakoneta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lamesa at 21.6% compared to 21.3% in Wapakoneta.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wapakoneta at 18.8% compared to 15.6% in Lamesa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lamesa at 41.2% compared to 38.8% in Wapakoneta.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lamesa at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Wapakoneta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lamesa | Wapakoneta |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.3% (278) | 0.1% (9) |
High School Diploma | 18.4% (1,547) | 26.9% (2,625) |
Less than High School | 34.2% (2,881) | 11.8% (1,157) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (736) | 14.0% (1,364) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lamesa vs Wapakoneta
- A higher percentage of residents in Lamesa have no formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.1% in Wapakoneta.
- In Wapakoneta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 18.4% in Lamesa.
- More residents in Lamesa have less than a high school education at 34.2% compared to 11.8% in Wapakoneta.
- In Wapakoneta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.0% compared to 8.7% in Lamesa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.