Demographics details for Lamesa, TX vs Victorville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lamesa, TX vs Victorville, CA.
| Data | Lamesa | Victorville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,425 | 137,221 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 31.8 years |
| Median Income | $39,434 | $65,746 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 7.5 |
Population Comparison: Lamesa vs Victorville
- The population in Victorville is higher at 137,221, compared to 8,425 in Lamesa.
- Residents in Lamesa have a higher median age of 33.1 years compared to 31.8 years in Victorville.
- Victorville has a higher median income of $65,746, compared to $39,434 in Lamesa.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Lamesa and Victorville at 31.0%.
- Lamesa has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Victorville.
- Victorville has a higher unemployment rate at 7.5% compared to 5.1% in Lamesa.
Demographics
Demographics Lamesa vs Victorville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lamesa | Victorville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 17 |
| White | 5 | 4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 73 | 54 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Lamesa vs Victorville
- In Victorville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 3% in Lamesa.
- Lamesa has a higher percentage of White residents at 5% compared to 4% in Victorville.
- In Victorville, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Lamesa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lamesa at 73% compared to 54% in Victorville.
- Both Lamesa and Victorville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 19%.
- In Victorville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Lamesa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lamesa | Victorville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 19.0% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 41.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lamesa vs Victorville
- More residents in Lamesa report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.4% in Victorville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lamesa at 24.0% compared to 19.0% in Victorville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lamesa at 21.6% compared to 16.2% in Victorville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lamesa at 15.6% compared to 14.8% in Victorville.
- Victorville has higher obesity rates at 41.3% compared to 41.2% in Lamesa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lamesa at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Victorville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lamesa | Victorville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.3% (278) | 1.7% (2,334) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (1,547) | 15.1% (20,711) |
| Less than High School | 34.2% (2,881) | 24.1% (33,076) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (736) | 6.6% (9,125) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lamesa vs Victorville
- A higher percentage of residents in Lamesa have no formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 1.7% in Victorville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lamesa hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 15.1% in Victorville.
- More residents in Lamesa have less than a high school education at 34.2% compared to 24.1% in Victorville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lamesa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.7% compared to 6.6% in Victorville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.