Demographics details for Lamesa, TX vs Pearl city, HI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lamesa, TX vs Pearl city, HI.
| Data | Lamesa | Pearl city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,425 | 46,812 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 44.2 years |
| Median Income | $39,434 | $116,938 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Lamesa vs Pearl city
- The population in Pearl city is higher at 46,812, compared to 8,425 in Lamesa.
- The median age in Pearl city is higher at 44.2 years, compared to 33.1 years in Lamesa.
- Pearl city has a higher median income of $116,938, compared to $39,434 in Lamesa.
- In Pearl city, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 31.0% in Lamesa.
- Lamesa has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 7% in Pearl city.
- The unemployment rate in Lamesa is higher at 5.1%, compared to 2.5% in Pearl city.
Demographics
Demographics Lamesa vs Pearl city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lamesa | Pearl city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 5 | 10 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 55 |
| Hispanic | 73 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 24 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lamesa vs Pearl city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lamesa at 3% compared to 2% in Pearl city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pearl city at 10% compared to 5% in Lamesa.
- In Pearl city, the Asian population stands at 55%, greater than 0% in Lamesa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lamesa at 73% compared to 9% in Pearl city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pearl city at 24%, compared to 19% in Lamesa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lamesa and Pearl city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lamesa | Pearl city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 12.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 7.2% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 11.1% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 10.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 22.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lamesa vs Pearl city
- More residents in Lamesa report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 12.1% in Pearl city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lamesa at 24.0% compared to 11.1% in Pearl city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lamesa at 21.6% compared to 10.4% in Pearl city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pearl city at 17.8% compared to 15.6% in Lamesa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lamesa at 41.2% compared to 22.3% in Pearl city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lamesa at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Pearl city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lamesa | Pearl city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.3% (278) | 0.8% (356) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (1,547) | 16.9% (7,924) |
| Less than High School | 34.2% (2,881) | 4.2% (1,969) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (736) | 27.0% (12,639) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lamesa vs Pearl city
- A higher percentage of residents in Lamesa have no formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.8% in Pearl city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lamesa hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 16.9% in Pearl city.
- More residents in Lamesa have less than a high school education at 34.2% compared to 4.2% in Pearl city.
- In Pearl city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.0% compared to 8.7% in Lamesa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.