Demographics details for Lamesa, TX vs Hawthorne, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lamesa, TX vs Hawthorne, CA.
| Data | Lamesa | Hawthorne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,425 | 84,563 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 33.3 years |
| Median Income | $39,434 | $72,298 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Lamesa vs Hawthorne
- The population in Hawthorne is higher at 84,563, compared to 8,425 in Lamesa.
- The median age in Hawthorne is higher at 33.3 years, compared to 33.1 years in Lamesa.
- Hawthorne has a higher median income of $72,298, compared to $39,434 in Lamesa.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Lamesa and Hawthorne at 31.0%.
- Lamesa has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 14% in Hawthorne.
- Hawthorne has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 5.1% in Lamesa.
Demographics
Demographics Lamesa vs Hawthorne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lamesa | Hawthorne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 27 |
| White | 5 | -10 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 73 | 57 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Lamesa vs Hawthorne
- In Hawthorne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 27% compared to 3% in Lamesa.
- Lamesa has a higher percentage of White residents at 5% compared to -10% in Hawthorne.
- In Hawthorne, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Lamesa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lamesa at 73% compared to 57% in Hawthorne.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lamesa at 19% compared to 17% in Hawthorne.
- In Hawthorne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Lamesa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lamesa | Hawthorne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 15.5% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lamesa vs Hawthorne
- More residents in Lamesa report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.5% in Hawthorne.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lamesa at 24.0% compared to 15.5% in Hawthorne.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lamesa at 21.6% compared to 12.7% in Hawthorne.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lamesa at 15.6% compared to 14.1% in Hawthorne.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lamesa at 41.2% compared to 32.9% in Hawthorne.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lamesa at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Hawthorne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lamesa | Hawthorne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.3% (278) | 2.6% (2,159) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (1,547) | 14.5% (12,220) |
| Less than High School | 34.2% (2,881) | 26.9% (22,712) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (736) | 16.4% (13,868) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lamesa vs Hawthorne
- A higher percentage of residents in Lamesa have no formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 2.6% in Hawthorne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lamesa hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 14.5% in Hawthorne.
- More residents in Lamesa have less than a high school education at 34.2% compared to 26.9% in Hawthorne.
- In Hawthorne, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 8.7% in Lamesa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.