Demographics details for Lakewood, NJ vs Sterling, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lakewood, NJ vs Sterling, IL.
| Data | Lakewood | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 68,555 | 14,566 |
| Median Age | 17.5 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,826 | $49,007 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lakewood vs Sterling
- In Lakewood, the population is higher at 68,555, compared to 14,566 in Sterling.
- The median age in Sterling is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 17.5 years in Lakewood.
- Lakewood has a higher median income of $54,826 compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lakewood at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Sterling.
- The poverty level is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 6% in Lakewood.
- Sterling has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.7% in Lakewood.
Demographics
Demographics Lakewood vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lakewood | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 81 | 56 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lakewood vs Sterling
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Lakewood and Sterling at 2%.
- Lakewood has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 56% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Lakewood.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 12% in Lakewood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 4% in Lakewood.
- In Sterling, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lakewood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lakewood | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lakewood vs Sterling
- More residents in Lakewood report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.7% in Sterling.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lakewood at 24.4% compared to 22.2% in Sterling.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lakewood at 19.6% compared to 18.6% in Sterling.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling at 17.4% compared to 14.9% in Lakewood.
- Sterling has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 38.6% in Lakewood.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling at 17.0% compared to 4.0% in Lakewood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lakewood | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (258) | 1.1% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 9.9% (6,781) | 24.1% (3,511) |
| Less than High School | 7.5% (5,126) | 13.8% (2,012) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (8,277) | 11.8% (1,713) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lakewood vs Sterling
- In Sterling, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Lakewood.
- In Sterling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.1% compared to 9.9% in Lakewood.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling at 13.8%, compared to 7.5% in Lakewood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lakewood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 11.8% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.