Demographics details for Lakeville, MN vs Turner, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lakeville, MN vs Turner, OR.
| Data | Lakeville | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,553 | 2,422 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $129,069 | $101,292 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 61.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lakeville vs Turner
- In Lakeville, the population is higher at 74,553, compared to 2,422 in Turner.
- The median age in Turner is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 36.5 years in Lakeville.
- Lakeville has a higher median income of $129,069 compared to $101,292 in Turner.
- In Turner, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 45.0% in Lakeville.
- The poverty level is higher in Turner at 5%, compared to 4% in Lakeville.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Lakeville and Turner at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Lakeville vs Turner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lakeville | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 80 | 77 |
| Asian | 6 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lakeville vs Turner
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lakeville at 4% compared to 0% in Turner.
- Lakeville has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 77% in Turner.
- The Asian population is larger in Lakeville at 6% compared to 2% in Turner.
- Turner has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 5% in Lakeville.
- Both Lakeville and Turner have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lakeville and Turner at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lakeville | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.3% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 28.2% |
| Smoking | 11.7% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 30.3% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lakeville vs Turner
- In Turner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 12.3% in Lakeville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Turner at 28.2% versus 21.6% in Lakeville.
- Turner has a higher smoking rate at 13.7% compared to 11.7% in Lakeville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lakeville at 18.9% compared to 18.0% in Turner.
- Turner has higher obesity rates at 33.6% compared to 30.3% in Lakeville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Turner at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Lakeville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lakeville | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (366) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 8.9% (6,669) | 12.8% (311) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (2,337) | 9.2% (223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.5% (22,706) | 23.3% (564) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lakeville vs Turner
- A higher percentage of residents in Lakeville have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Turner.
- In Turner, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.8% compared to 8.9% in Lakeville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Turner at 9.2%, compared to 3.1% in Lakeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lakeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 23.3% in Turner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.