Demographics details for Lake park, IA vs Snover, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lake park, IA vs Snover, MI.
Data | Lake park | Snover |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,173 | 260 |
Median Age | 40.1 years | 51.5 years |
Median Income | $75,476 | $44,948 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lake park vs Snover
- In Lake park, the population is higher at 1,173, compared to 260 in Snover.
- The median age in Snover is higher at 51.5 years, compared to 40.1 years in Lake park.
- Lake park has a higher median income of $75,476 compared to $44,948 in Snover.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lake park at 47.0% compared to 41.0% in Snover.
- The poverty level is higher in Snover at 9%, compared to 4% in Lake park.
- Snover has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.1% in Lake park.
Demographics
Demographics Lake park vs Snover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lake park | Snover |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 93 | 97 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lake park vs Snover
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Lake park and Snover at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Snover at 97% compared to 93% in Lake park.
- In Snover, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Lake park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lake park at 4% compared to 0% in Snover.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lake park at 3% compared to 0% in Snover.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lake park and Snover at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lake park | Snover |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 12.8% |
Depression | 18.9% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 16.1% | 22.9% |
Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 37.1% | 35.3% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lake park vs Snover
- In Snover, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.8% in Lake park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Snover at 26.5% versus 18.9% in Lake park.
- Snover has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 16.1% in Lake park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lake park at 23.5% compared to 17.4% in Snover.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lake park at 37.1% compared to 35.3% in Snover.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Snover at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Lake park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lake park | Snover |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (3) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 26.5% (311) | 36.5% (95) |
Less than High School | 1.4% (16) | 29.2% (76) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (122) | 1.9% (5) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lake park vs Snover
- A higher percentage of residents in Lake park have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Snover.
- In Snover, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 36.5% compared to 26.5% in Lake park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Snover at 29.2%, compared to 1.4% in Lake park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lake park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 1.9% in Snover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.