Demographics details for Lake park, GA vs Shasta lake, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lake park, GA vs Shasta lake, CA.
Data | Lake park | Shasta lake |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,412 | 10,335 |
Median Age | 28.9 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $36,429 | $54,490 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Lake park vs Shasta lake
- The population in Shasta lake is higher at 10,335, compared to 1,412 in Lake park.
- The median age in Shasta lake is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 28.9 years in Lake park.
- Shasta lake has a higher median income of $54,490, compared to $36,429 in Lake park.
- In Shasta lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 19.0% in Lake park.
- Lake park has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Shasta lake.
- Shasta lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Lake park.
Demographics
Demographics Lake park vs Shasta lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lake park | Shasta lake |
---|---|---|
Black | 16 | Data is updating |
White | 77 | 74 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Lake park vs Shasta lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lake park at 16% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
- Lake park has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 74% in Shasta lake.
- Both Lake park and Shasta lake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Shasta lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Lake park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shasta lake at 11%, compared to 3% in Lake park.
- In Shasta lake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Lake park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lake park | Shasta lake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.2% |
Depression | 23.7% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 18.4% | 17.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 36.7% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lake park vs Shasta lake
- In Shasta lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.9% in Lake park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lake park at 23.7% compared to 22.9% in Shasta lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lake park at 18.4% compared to 17.4% in Shasta lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shasta lake at 17.5% compared to 15.7% in Lake park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lake park at 36.7% compared to 32.5% in Shasta lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 5.0% in Lake park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lake park | Shasta lake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (4) | 0.6% (67) |
High School Diploma | 13.7% (193) | 17.0% (1,759) |
Less than High School | 2.3% (32) | 11.4% (1,176) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.5% (63) | 9.2% (946) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lake park vs Shasta lake
- In Shasta lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Lake park.
- In Shasta lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 13.7% in Lake park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shasta lake at 11.4%, compared to 2.3% in Lake park.
- In Shasta lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 4.5% in Lake park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.