Demographics details for Lake park, GA vs Flint, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lake park, GA vs Flint, MI.
| Data | Lake park | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,412 | 79,854 |
| Median Age | 28.9 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $36,429 | $35,451 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 32% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 10.4 |
Population Comparison: Lake park vs Flint
- The population in Flint is higher at 79,854, compared to 1,412 in Lake park.
- The median age in Flint is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 28.9 years in Lake park.
- Lake park has a higher median income of $36,429 compared to $35,451 in Flint.
- In Flint, the percentage of married families is higher at 20.0%, compared to 19.0% in Lake park.
- The poverty level is higher in Flint at 32%, compared to 15% in Lake park.
- Flint has a higher unemployment rate at 10.4% compared to 3.5% in Lake park.
Demographics
Demographics Lake park vs Flint provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lake park | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 58 |
| White | 77 | 30 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lake park vs Flint
- In Flint, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 16% in Lake park.
- Lake park has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 30% in Flint.
- Both Lake park and Flint have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Flint has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Lake park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Flint at 7%, compared to 3% in Lake park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lake park and Flint at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lake park | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 17.3% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 18.4% | 29.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 51.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lake park vs Flint
- In Flint, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 17.9% in Lake park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flint at 25.6% versus 23.7% in Lake park.
- Flint has a higher smoking rate at 29.5% compared to 18.4% in Lake park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lake park at 15.7% compared to 14.0% in Flint.
- Flint has higher obesity rates at 51.7% compared to 36.7% in Lake park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flint at 25.0% compared to 5.0% in Lake park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lake park | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (4) | 0.8% (629) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (193) | 20.2% (16,121) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (32) | 15.3% (12,181) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.5% (63) | 8.3% (6,616) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lake park vs Flint
- In Flint, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Lake park.
- In Flint, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 13.7% in Lake park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flint at 15.3%, compared to 2.3% in Lake park.
- In Flint, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.3% compared to 4.5% in Lake park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.