Demographics details for Lake park, GA vs Claremont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lake park, GA vs Claremont, CA.
| Data | Lake park | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,412 | 36,001 |
| Median Age | 28.9 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $36,429 | $115,091 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Lake park vs Claremont
- The population in Claremont is higher at 36,001, compared to 1,412 in Lake park.
- The median age in Claremont is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 28.9 years in Lake park.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091, compared to $36,429 in Lake park.
- In Claremont, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 19.0% in Lake park.
- Lake park has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.5% in Lake park.
Demographics
Demographics Lake park vs Claremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lake park | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 6 |
| White | 77 | 37 |
| Asian | 1 | 16 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lake park vs Claremont
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lake park at 16% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- Lake park has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 37% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 1% in Lake park.
- Claremont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 3% in Lake park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Claremont at 16%, compared to 3% in Lake park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lake park and Claremont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lake park | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 18.4% | 8.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 24.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lake park vs Claremont
- More residents in Lake park report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lake park at 23.7% compared to 16.3% in Claremont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lake park at 18.4% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Claremont at 16.7% compared to 15.7% in Lake park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lake park at 36.7% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Claremont at 11.0% compared to 5.0% in Lake park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lake park | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (4) | 1.1% (403) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (193) | 6.7% (2,427) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (32) | 6.2% (2,248) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.5% (63) | 39.5% (14,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lake park vs Claremont
- In Claremont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Lake park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lake park hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Claremont at 6.2%, compared to 2.3% in Lake park.
- In Claremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 4.5% in Lake park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.