Demographics details for Lake park, GA vs Bigfork, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lake park, GA vs Bigfork, MN.
| Data | Lake park | Bigfork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,412 | 403 |
| Median Age | 28.9 years | 66.3 years |
| Median Income | $36,429 | $33,750 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lake park vs Bigfork
- In Lake park, the population is higher at 1,412, compared to 403 in Bigfork.
- The median age in Bigfork is higher at 66.3 years, compared to 28.9 years in Lake park.
- Lake park has a higher median income of $36,429 compared to $33,750 in Bigfork.
- In Bigfork, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 19.0% in Lake park.
- Lake park has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Bigfork.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Lake park and Bigfork at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Lake park vs Bigfork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lake park | Bigfork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 1 |
| White | 77 | 93 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Lake park vs Bigfork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lake park at 16% compared to 1% in Bigfork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bigfork at 93% compared to 77% in Lake park.
- The Asian population is larger in Lake park at 1% compared to 0% in Bigfork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lake park at 3% compared to 2% in Bigfork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lake park at 3% compared to 1% in Bigfork.
- In Bigfork, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Lake park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lake park | Bigfork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 18.4% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lake park vs Bigfork
- More residents in Lake park report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.0% in Bigfork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bigfork at 24.3% versus 23.7% in Lake park.
- Bigfork has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 18.4% in Lake park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bigfork at 18.4% compared to 15.7% in Lake park.
- Bigfork has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 36.7% in Lake park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bigfork at 23.0% compared to 5.0% in Lake park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lake park | Bigfork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (4) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (193) | 26.6% (107) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (32) | 9.7% (39) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.5% (63) | 8.2% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lake park vs Bigfork
- A higher percentage of residents in Lake park have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Bigfork.
- In Bigfork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.6% compared to 13.7% in Lake park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bigfork at 9.7%, compared to 2.3% in Lake park.
- In Bigfork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.2% compared to 4.5% in Lake park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.