Demographics details for Lake leelanau, MI vs Windsor, CT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lake leelanau, MI vs Windsor, CT.

Data Lake leelanau Windsor
Population 165 29,044
Median Age 27.9 years 40.0 years
Median Income $48,125 $87,000
Married Families 32.0% 55.0%
Poverty Level 9% 7%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 2.8

Population Comparison: Lake leelanau vs Windsor

  • The population in Windsor is higher at 29,044, compared to 165 in Lake leelanau.
  • The median age in Windsor is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 27.9 years in Lake leelanau.
  • Windsor has a higher median income of $87,000, compared to $48,125 in Lake leelanau.
  • In Windsor, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lake leelanau.
  • Lake leelanau has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Windsor.
  • The unemployment rate in Lake leelanau is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.8% in Windsor.

Demographics

Demographics Lake leelanau vs Windsor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lake leelanau Windsor
Black Data is updating 12
White 100 76
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic Data is updating 7
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lake leelanau vs Windsor

  • In Windsor, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • Lake leelanau has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 76% in Windsor.
  • In Windsor, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • Windsor has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Windsor at 5%, compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lake leelanau and Windsor at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lake leelanau Windsor
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% Data is updating%
Depression 22.5% Data is updating%
Smoking 12.5% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.9% Data is updating%
Obesity 31.7% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 24.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lake leelanau vs Windsor

  • More residents in Lake leelanau report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Windsor.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lake leelanau at 22.5% compared to 0.0% in Windsor.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lake leelanau at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Windsor.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lake leelanau at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Windsor.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lake leelanau at 31.7% compared to 0.0% in Windsor.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lake leelanau at 24.0% compared to 0.0% in Windsor.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lake leelanau Windsor
No Schooling 2.4% (4) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.3% (22) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 4.8% (8) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.9% (23) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Lake leelanau vs Windsor

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lake leelanau have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Windsor.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lake leelanau hold a high school diploma at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Windsor.
  • More residents in Lake leelanau have less than a high school education at 4.8% compared to 0.0% in Windsor.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lake leelanau hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Windsor.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.