Demographics details for Lake leelanau, MI vs Livingston, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lake leelanau, MI vs Livingston, AL.

Data Lake leelanau Livingston
Population 165 3,205
Median Age 27.9 years 21.2 years
Median Income $48,125 $20,417
Married Families 32.0% 19.0%
Poverty Level 9% 27%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 4.2

Population Comparison: Lake leelanau vs Livingston

  • The population in Livingston is higher at 3,205, compared to 165 in Lake leelanau.
  • Residents in Lake leelanau have a higher median age of 27.9 years compared to 21.2 years in Livingston.
  • Lake leelanau has a higher median income of $48,125 compared to $20,417 in Livingston.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lake leelanau at 32.0% compared to 19.0% in Livingston.
  • The poverty level is higher in Livingston at 27%, compared to 9% in Lake leelanau.
  • Livingston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Lake leelanau.

Demographics

Demographics Lake leelanau vs Livingston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lake leelanau Livingston
Black Data is updating 58
White 100 38
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 1
Two or More Races Data is updating 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lake leelanau vs Livingston

  • In Livingston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • Lake leelanau has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 38% in Livingston.
  • In Livingston, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • Livingston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Livingston at 2%, compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lake leelanau and Livingston at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lake leelanau Livingston
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 20.4%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% 14.7%
Depression 22.5% 22.0%
Smoking 12.5% 21.5%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 12.3%
Obesity 31.7% 46.2%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lake leelanau vs Livingston

  • In Livingston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 14.4% in Lake leelanau.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lake leelanau at 22.5% compared to 22.0% in Livingston.
  • Livingston has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 12.5% in Lake leelanau.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lake leelanau at 18.9% compared to 12.3% in Livingston.
  • Livingston has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 31.7% in Lake leelanau.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lake leelanau at 24.0% compared to 17.0% in Livingston.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lake leelanau Livingston
No Schooling 2.4% (4) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.3% (22) 7.7% (248)
Less than High School 4.8% (8) 2.3% (74)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.9% (23) 15.5% (496)

Education Levels Comparison: Lake leelanau vs Livingston

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lake leelanau have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Livingston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lake leelanau hold a high school diploma at 13.3% compared to 7.7% in Livingston.
  • More residents in Lake leelanau have less than a high school education at 4.8% compared to 2.3% in Livingston.
  • In Livingston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 13.9% in Lake leelanau.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.