Demographics details for Lake leelanau, MI vs Concord, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lake leelanau, MI vs Concord, CA.
Data | Lake leelanau | Concord |
---|---|---|
Population | 165 | 122,625 |
Median Age | 27.9 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $48,125 | $107,789 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Lake leelanau vs Concord
- The population in Concord is higher at 122,625, compared to 165 in Lake leelanau.
- The median age in Concord is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 27.9 years in Lake leelanau.
- Concord has a higher median income of $107,789, compared to $48,125 in Lake leelanau.
- In Concord, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lake leelanau.
- The poverty level is higher in Concord at 11%, compared to 9% in Lake leelanau.
- Concord has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 4.1% in Lake leelanau.
Demographics
Demographics Lake leelanau vs Concord provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lake leelanau | Concord |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 4 |
White | 100 | 33 |
Asian | Data is updating | 14 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 32 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lake leelanau vs Concord
- In Concord, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- Lake leelanau has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 33% in Concord.
- In Concord, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Lake leelanau.
- Concord has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Concord at 16%, compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- In Concord, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lake leelanau | Concord |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 10.0% |
Depression | 22.5% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 12.5% | 10.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 31.7% | 25.6% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lake leelanau vs Concord
- In Concord, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 14.4% in Lake leelanau.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lake leelanau at 22.5% compared to 17.8% in Concord.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lake leelanau at 12.5% compared to 10.7% in Concord.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lake leelanau at 18.9% compared to 17.0% in Concord.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lake leelanau at 31.7% compared to 25.6% in Concord.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lake leelanau at 24.0% compared to 12.0% in Concord.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lake leelanau | Concord |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (4) | 1.8% (2,147) |
High School Diploma | 13.3% (22) | 13.0% (15,969) |
Less than High School | 4.8% (8) | 15.7% (19,274) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (23) | 27.1% (33,174) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lake leelanau vs Concord
- A higher percentage of residents in Lake leelanau have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.8% in Concord.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lake leelanau hold a high school diploma at 13.3% compared to 13.0% in Concord.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Concord at 15.7%, compared to 4.8% in Lake leelanau.
- In Concord, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 13.9% in Lake leelanau.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.