Demographics details for Lake havasu city, AZ vs Whiting, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lake havasu city, AZ vs Whiting, KS.

Data Lake havasu city Whiting
Population 58,926 195
Median Age 54.3 years 33.7 years
Median Income $64,027 $52,000
Married Families 46.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 11% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.1 Data is updating

Population Comparison: Lake havasu city vs Whiting

  • In Lake havasu city, the population is higher at 58,926, compared to 195 in Whiting.
  • Residents in Lake havasu city have a higher median age of 54.3 years compared to 33.7 years in Whiting.
  • Lake havasu city has a higher median income of $64,027 compared to $52,000 in Whiting.
  • In Whiting, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 46.0% in Lake havasu city.
  • Lake havasu city has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Whiting.
  • The unemployment rate in Lake havasu city is higher at 4.1%, compared to 0.0% in Whiting.

Demographics

Demographics Lake havasu city vs Whiting provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lake havasu city Whiting
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 75 87
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 15 2
Two or More Races 8 11
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lake havasu city vs Whiting

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Lake havasu city and Whiting at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Whiting at 87% compared to 75% in Lake havasu city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lake havasu city at 1% compared to 0% in Whiting.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Lake havasu city at 15% compared to 2% in Whiting.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Whiting at 11%, compared to 8% in Lake havasu city.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lake havasu city at 1% compared to 0% in Whiting.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lake havasu city Whiting
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 16.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 9.9%
Depression 20.6% 22.9%
Smoking 18.0% 17.9%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 19.3%
Obesity 33.6% 39.3%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lake havasu city vs Whiting

  • More residents in Lake havasu city report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.1% in Whiting.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Whiting at 22.9% versus 20.6% in Lake havasu city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lake havasu city at 18.0% compared to 17.9% in Whiting.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Whiting at 19.3% compared to 19.2% in Lake havasu city.
  • Whiting has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 33.6% in Lake havasu city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lake havasu city at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Whiting.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lake havasu city Whiting
No Schooling 1.1% (664) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 20.8% (12,284) 28.7% (56)
Less than High School 12.8% (7,543) 9.2% (18)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.2% (8,359) 14.9% (29)

Education Levels Comparison: Lake havasu city vs Whiting

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lake havasu city have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Whiting.
  • In Whiting, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 20.8% in Lake havasu city.
  • More residents in Lake havasu city have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 9.2% in Whiting.
  • In Whiting, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 14.2% in Lake havasu city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.