Demographics details for Lake havasu city, AZ vs Crosbyton, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lake havasu city, AZ vs Crosbyton, TX.

Data Lake havasu city Crosbyton
Population 58,926 1,461
Median Age 54.3 years 39.1 years
Median Income $64,027 $47,083
Married Families 46.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 11% 22%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 3.2

Population Comparison: Lake havasu city vs Crosbyton

  • In Lake havasu city, the population is higher at 58,926, compared to 1,461 in Crosbyton.
  • Residents in Lake havasu city have a higher median age of 54.3 years compared to 39.1 years in Crosbyton.
  • Lake havasu city has a higher median income of $64,027 compared to $47,083 in Crosbyton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lake havasu city at 46.0% compared to 44.0% in Crosbyton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Crosbyton at 22%, compared to 11% in Lake havasu city.
  • The unemployment rate in Lake havasu city is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.2% in Crosbyton.

Demographics

Demographics Lake havasu city vs Crosbyton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lake havasu city Crosbyton
Black Data is updating 3
White 75 6
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 15 75
Two or More Races 8 16
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lake havasu city vs Crosbyton

  • In Crosbyton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Lake havasu city.
  • Lake havasu city has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 6% in Crosbyton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lake havasu city at 1% compared to 0% in Crosbyton.
  • Crosbyton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 15% in Lake havasu city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crosbyton at 16%, compared to 8% in Lake havasu city.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lake havasu city at 1% compared to 0% in Crosbyton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lake havasu city Crosbyton
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 15.6%
Depression 20.6% 23.6%
Smoking 18.0% 20.5%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 15.4%
Obesity 33.6% 42.7%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lake havasu city vs Crosbyton

  • In Crosbyton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.5% in Lake havasu city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Crosbyton at 23.6% versus 20.6% in Lake havasu city.
  • Crosbyton has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 18.0% in Lake havasu city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lake havasu city at 19.2% compared to 15.4% in Crosbyton.
  • Crosbyton has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 33.6% in Lake havasu city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crosbyton at 26.0% compared to 18.0% in Lake havasu city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lake havasu city Crosbyton
No Schooling 1.1% (664) 2.1% (30)
High School Diploma 20.8% (12,284) 24.6% (359)
Less than High School 12.8% (7,543) 37.1% (542)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.2% (8,359) 8.8% (129)

Education Levels Comparison: Lake havasu city vs Crosbyton

  • In Crosbyton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.1% in Lake havasu city.
  • In Crosbyton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 20.8% in Lake havasu city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crosbyton at 37.1%, compared to 12.8% in Lake havasu city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lake havasu city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 8.8% in Crosbyton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.