Demographics details for Lake havasu city, AZ vs Charleston, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lake havasu city, AZ vs Charleston, SC.

Data Lake havasu city Charleston
Population 58,926 153,672
Median Age 54.3 years 36.3 years
Median Income $64,027 $83,891
Married Families 46.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 11% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 3.8

Population Comparison: Lake havasu city vs Charleston

  • The population in Charleston is higher at 153,672, compared to 58,926 in Lake havasu city.
  • Residents in Lake havasu city have a higher median age of 54.3 years compared to 36.3 years in Charleston.
  • Charleston has a higher median income of $83,891, compared to $64,027 in Lake havasu city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lake havasu city at 46.0% compared to 37.0% in Charleston.
  • The poverty level is higher in Charleston at 12%, compared to 11% in Lake havasu city.
  • The unemployment rate in Lake havasu city is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.8% in Charleston.

Demographics

Demographics Lake havasu city vs Charleston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lake havasu city Charleston
Black Data is updating 18
White 75 71
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 15 5
Two or More Races 8 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lake havasu city vs Charleston

  • In Charleston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 0% in Lake havasu city.
  • Lake havasu city has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 71% in Charleston.
  • In Charleston, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Lake havasu city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Lake havasu city at 15% compared to 5% in Charleston.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Lake havasu city at 8% compared to 4% in Charleston.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lake havasu city at 1% compared to 0% in Charleston.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lake havasu city Charleston
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 9.4%
Depression 20.6% 19.6%
Smoking 18.0% 13.0%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 23.0%
Obesity 33.6% 31.8%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lake havasu city vs Charleston

  • More residents in Lake havasu city report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.6% in Charleston.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lake havasu city at 20.6% compared to 19.6% in Charleston.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lake havasu city at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Charleston.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Charleston at 23.0% compared to 19.2% in Lake havasu city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lake havasu city at 33.6% compared to 31.8% in Charleston.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lake havasu city at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Charleston.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lake havasu city Charleston
No Schooling 1.1% (664) 0.4% (646)
High School Diploma 20.8% (12,284) 9.1% (13,959)
Less than High School 12.8% (7,543) 4.3% (6,655)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.2% (8,359) 39.9% (61,263)

Education Levels Comparison: Lake havasu city vs Charleston

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lake havasu city have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lake havasu city hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 9.1% in Charleston.
  • More residents in Lake havasu city have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 4.3% in Charleston.
  • In Charleston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 14.2% in Lake havasu city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.