Demographics details for Lake butler, FL vs Lexington, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lake butler, FL vs Lexington, TN.
Data | Lake butler | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,765 | 7,952 |
Median Age | 43.8 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $150,316 | $45,877 |
Married Families | 55.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lake butler vs Lexington
- In Lake butler, the population is higher at 17,765, compared to 7,952 in Lexington.
- Residents in Lake butler have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 36.6 years in Lexington.
- Lake butler has a higher median income of $150,316 compared to $45,877 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lake butler at 55.0% compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 13%, compared to 10% in Lake butler.
- The unemployment rate in Lake butler is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Lexington.
Demographics
Demographics Lake butler vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lake butler | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 17 |
White | 53 | 81 |
Asian | 16 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lake butler vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 6% in Lake butler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lexington at 81% compared to 53% in Lake butler.
- The Asian population is larger in Lake butler at 16% compared to 0% in Lexington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lake butler at 12% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lake butler at 13% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lake butler and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lake butler | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 21.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 15.3% |
Depression | 16.3% | 30.4% |
Smoking | 11.4% | 26.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 14.4% |
Obesity | 23.4% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lake butler vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 13.0% in Lake butler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 30.4% versus 16.3% in Lake butler.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 11.4% in Lake butler.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lake butler at 15.8% compared to 14.4% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 23.4% in Lake butler.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Lake butler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lake butler | Lexington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (37) | 0.4% (29) |
High School Diploma | 5.1% (899) | 22.4% (1,783) |
Less than High School | 2.9% (520) | 14.6% (1,159) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (7,325) | 9.3% (740) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lake butler vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Lake butler.
- In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.4% compared to 5.1% in Lake butler.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 14.6%, compared to 2.9% in Lake butler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lake butler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 9.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.