Demographics details for Lake butler, FL vs Greenville, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lake butler, FL vs Greenville, NC.
Data | Lake butler | Greenville |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,765 | 89,233 |
Median Age | 43.8 years | 26.9 years |
Median Income | $150,316 | $47,485 |
Married Families | 55.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 23% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Lake butler vs Greenville
- The population in Greenville is higher at 89,233, compared to 17,765 in Lake butler.
- Residents in Lake butler have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 26.9 years in Greenville.
- Lake butler has a higher median income of $150,316 compared to $47,485 in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lake butler at 55.0% compared to 24.0% in Greenville.
- The poverty level is higher in Greenville at 23%, compared to 10% in Lake butler.
- Greenville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Lake butler.
Demographics
Demographics Lake butler vs Greenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lake butler | Greenville |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 39 |
White | 53 | 50 |
Asian | 16 | 3 |
Hispanic | 12 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lake butler vs Greenville
- In Greenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 39% compared to 6% in Lake butler.
- Lake butler has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 50% in Greenville.
- The Asian population is larger in Lake butler at 16% compared to 3% in Greenville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lake butler at 12% compared to 4% in Greenville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lake butler at 13% compared to 4% in Greenville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lake butler and Greenville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lake butler | Greenville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 12.0% |
Depression | 16.3% | 21.9% |
Smoking | 11.4% | 17.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 14.2% |
Obesity | 23.4% | 41.6% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lake butler vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Lake butler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Greenville at 21.9% versus 16.3% in Lake butler.
- Greenville has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 11.4% in Lake butler.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lake butler at 15.8% compared to 14.2% in Greenville.
- Greenville has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 23.4% in Lake butler.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenville at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Lake butler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lake butler | Greenville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (37) | 0.6% (512) |
High School Diploma | 5.1% (899) | 10.3% (9,215) |
Less than High School | 2.9% (520) | 4.6% (4,082) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (7,325) | 20.9% (18,672) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lake butler vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Lake butler.
- In Greenville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.3% compared to 5.1% in Lake butler.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Greenville at 4.6%, compared to 2.9% in Lake butler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lake butler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 20.9% in Greenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.