Demographics details for Laguna hills, CA vs Jefferson, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laguna hills, CA vs Jefferson, SD.
Data | Laguna hills | Jefferson |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,568 | 457 |
Median Age | 43.8 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $122,902 | $77,601 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 59.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 2.3 |
Population Comparison: Laguna hills vs Jefferson
- In Laguna hills, the population is higher at 30,568, compared to 457 in Jefferson.
- Residents in Laguna hills have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 37.1 years in Jefferson.
- Laguna hills has a higher median income of $122,902 compared to $77,601 in Jefferson.
- In Jefferson, the percentage of married families is higher at 59.0%, compared to 47.0% in Laguna hills.
- The poverty level is identical in both Laguna hills and Jefferson at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Laguna hills is higher at 3.9%, compared to 2.3% in Jefferson.
Demographics
Demographics Laguna hills vs Jefferson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Laguna hills | Jefferson |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 50 | 85 |
Asian | 17 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 20 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Laguna hills vs Jefferson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Laguna hills at 1% compared to 0% in Jefferson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jefferson at 85% compared to 50% in Laguna hills.
- The Asian population is larger in Laguna hills at 17% compared to 0% in Jefferson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Laguna hills at 20% compared to 6% in Jefferson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Laguna hills at 12% compared to 4% in Jefferson.
- In Jefferson, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Laguna hills.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Laguna hills | Jefferson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 12.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 8.2% |
Depression | 17.6% | 16.7% |
Smoking | 8.5% | 14.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 20.4% |
Obesity | 24.7% | 38.6% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laguna hills vs Jefferson
- More residents in Laguna hills report poor mental health at 13.7% compared to 12.5% in Jefferson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laguna hills at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in Jefferson.
- Jefferson has a higher smoking rate at 14.5% compared to 8.5% in Laguna hills.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jefferson at 20.4% compared to 17.6% in Laguna hills.
- Jefferson has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 24.7% in Laguna hills.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jefferson at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Laguna hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Laguna hills | Jefferson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (350) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 8.9% (2,708) | 22.3% (102) |
Less than High School | 8.7% (2,666) | 7.9% (36) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.8% (12,165) | 23.0% (105) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laguna hills vs Jefferson
- A higher percentage of residents in Laguna hills have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Jefferson.
- In Jefferson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 8.9% in Laguna hills.
- More residents in Laguna hills have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 7.9% in Jefferson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laguna hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.8% compared to 23.0% in Jefferson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.