Demographics details for Lagrange, GA vs Goose creek, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lagrange, GA vs Goose creek, SC.
| Data | Lagrange | Goose creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,773 | 47,618 |
| Median Age | 34.9 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $41,030 | $84,041 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Lagrange vs Goose creek
- The population in Goose creek is higher at 47,618, compared to 31,773 in Lagrange.
- Residents in Lagrange have a higher median age of 34.9 years compared to 32.0 years in Goose creek.
- Goose creek has a higher median income of $84,041, compared to $41,030 in Lagrange.
- In Goose creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 28.0% in Lagrange.
- Lagrange has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Goose creek.
- Goose creek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.0% in Lagrange.
Demographics
Demographics Lagrange vs Goose creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lagrange | Goose creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 51 | 20 |
| White | 38 | 63 |
| Asian | 3 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lagrange vs Goose creek
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lagrange at 51% compared to 20% in Goose creek.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Goose creek at 63% compared to 38% in Lagrange.
- Both Lagrange and Goose creek have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Goose creek has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Lagrange.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Goose creek at 6%, compared to 3% in Lagrange.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lagrange and Goose creek at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lagrange | Goose creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 22.1% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 46.7% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lagrange vs Goose creek
- More residents in Lagrange report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.9% in Goose creek.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lagrange at 22.0% compared to 19.2% in Goose creek.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lagrange at 22.1% compared to 15.8% in Goose creek.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Goose creek at 19.4% compared to 13.6% in Lagrange.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lagrange at 46.7% compared to 38.3% in Goose creek.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lagrange at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Goose creek.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lagrange | Goose creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (314) | 0.5% (235) |
| High School Diploma | 19.7% (6,259) | 12.6% (6,002) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (3,776) | 6.9% (3,266) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.7% (4,682) | 16.2% (7,733) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lagrange vs Goose creek
- A higher percentage of residents in Lagrange have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Goose creek.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lagrange hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 12.6% in Goose creek.
- More residents in Lagrange have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 6.9% in Goose creek.
- In Goose creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 14.7% in Lagrange.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.