Demographics details for Lafayette, LA vs Sterling, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lafayette, LA vs Sterling, IL.
Data | Lafayette | Sterling |
---|---|---|
Population | 121,389 | 14,566 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 43.0 years |
Median Income | $58,850 | $49,007 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lafayette vs Sterling
- In Lafayette, the population is higher at 121,389, compared to 14,566 in Sterling.
- The median age in Sterling is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 36.9 years in Lafayette.
- Lafayette has a higher median income of $58,850 compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lafayette at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in Sterling.
- Lafayette has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Lafayette.
Demographics
Demographics Lafayette vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lafayette | Sterling |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 2 |
White | 58 | 56 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 5 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lafayette vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lafayette at 29% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- Lafayette has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 56% in Sterling.
- Both Lafayette and Sterling have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 5% in Lafayette.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 6% in Lafayette.
- In Sterling, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lafayette.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lafayette | Sterling |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 12.2% |
Depression | 26.4% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 18.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lafayette vs Sterling
- More residents in Lafayette report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.7% in Sterling.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lafayette at 26.4% compared to 22.2% in Sterling.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lafayette at 20.0% compared to 18.6% in Sterling.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lafayette at 18.9% compared to 17.4% in Sterling.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lafayette at 40.0% compared to 39.5% in Sterling.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Lafayette.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lafayette | Sterling |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (803) | 1.1% (164) |
High School Diploma | 14.8% (17,954) | 24.1% (3,511) |
Less than High School | 8.9% (10,815) | 13.8% (2,012) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.4% (33,262) | 11.8% (1,713) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lafayette vs Sterling
- In Sterling, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Lafayette.
- In Sterling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.1% compared to 14.8% in Lafayette.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling at 13.8%, compared to 8.9% in Lafayette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lafayette hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.4% compared to 11.8% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.