Demographics details for Lafayette, LA vs Newark, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lafayette, LA vs Newark, NJ.
| Data | Lafayette | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 121,389 | 305,344 |
| Median Age | 36.9 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $58,850 | $46,460 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 7.8 |
Population Comparison: Lafayette vs Newark
- The population in Newark is higher at 305,344, compared to 121,389 in Lafayette.
- Residents in Lafayette have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 34.7 years in Newark.
- Lafayette has a higher median income of $58,850 compared to $46,460 in Newark.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lafayette at 35.0% compared to 25.0% in Newark.
- The poverty level is higher in Newark at 30%, compared to 18% in Lafayette.
- Newark has a higher unemployment rate at 7.8% compared to 4.1% in Lafayette.
Demographics
Demographics Lafayette vs Newark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lafayette | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 47 |
| White | 58 | 3 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lafayette vs Newark
- In Newark, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 47% compared to 29% in Lafayette.
- Lafayette has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 3% in Newark.
- Both Lafayette and Newark have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Newark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 5% in Lafayette.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Newark at 11%, compared to 6% in Lafayette.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lafayette and Newark at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lafayette | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lafayette vs Newark
- More residents in Lafayette report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.1% in Newark.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lafayette at 26.4% compared to 18.2% in Newark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lafayette at 20.0% compared to 19.5% in Newark.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lafayette at 18.9% compared to 13.9% in Newark.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lafayette at 40.0% compared to 38.5% in Newark.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Newark at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Lafayette.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lafayette | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (803) | 2.5% (7,516) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (17,954) | 21.9% (66,812) |
| Less than High School | 8.9% (10,815) | 24.1% (73,461) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.4% (33,262) | 11.1% (33,938) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lafayette vs Newark
- In Newark, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.7% in Lafayette.
- In Newark, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 14.8% in Lafayette.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Newark at 24.1%, compared to 8.9% in Lafayette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lafayette hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.4% compared to 11.1% in Newark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.