Demographics details for Lafayette, LA vs Central city, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lafayette, LA vs Central city, KY.

Data Lafayette Central city
Population 121,389 5,810
Median Age 36.9 years 33.5 years
Median Income $58,850 $52,184
Married Families 35.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 18% 16%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 3.5

Population Comparison: Lafayette vs Central city

  • In Lafayette, the population is higher at 121,389, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
  • Residents in Lafayette have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
  • Lafayette has a higher median income of $58,850 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
  • In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Lafayette.
  • Lafayette has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 16% in Central city.
  • The unemployment rate in Lafayette is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Central city.

Demographics

Demographics Lafayette vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lafayette Central city
Black 29 3
White 58 88
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 2
Two or More Races 6 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Lafayette vs Central city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lafayette at 29% compared to 3% in Central city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 58% in Lafayette.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lafayette at 2% compared to 0% in Central city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Lafayette at 5% compared to 2% in Central city.
  • Both Lafayette and Central city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
  • In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lafayette.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lafayette Central city
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 15.5%
Depression 26.4% 26.8%
Smoking 20.0% 24.8%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 14.8%
Obesity 40.0% 41.9%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lafayette vs Central city

  • In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.3% in Lafayette.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 26.4% in Lafayette.
  • Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 20.0% in Lafayette.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lafayette at 18.9% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
  • Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 40.0% in Lafayette.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Lafayette.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lafayette Central city
No Schooling 0.7% (803) 1.1% (65)
High School Diploma 14.8% (17,954) 15.4% (897)
Less than High School 8.9% (10,815) 15.6% (905)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.4% (33,262) 8.3% (480)

Education Levels Comparison: Lafayette vs Central city

  • In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Lafayette.
  • In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.4% compared to 14.8% in Lafayette.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 8.9% in Lafayette.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lafayette hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.4% compared to 8.3% in Central city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.