Demographics details for Lafayette, IN vs Chesapeake, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lafayette, IN vs Chesapeake, VA.
Data | Lafayette | Chesapeake |
---|---|---|
Population | 71,402 | 252,488 |
Median Age | 33.0 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $50,674 | $92,703 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Lafayette vs Chesapeake
- The population in Chesapeake is higher at 252,488, compared to 71,402 in Lafayette.
- The median age in Chesapeake is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 33.0 years in Lafayette.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703, compared to $50,674 in Lafayette.
- In Chesapeake, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 33.0% in Lafayette.
- Lafayette has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- The unemployment rate in Lafayette is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Lafayette vs Chesapeake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lafayette | Chesapeake |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 29 |
White | 72 | 53 |
Asian | 2 | 4 |
Hispanic | 12 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lafayette vs Chesapeake
- In Chesapeake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 9% in Lafayette.
- Lafayette has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
- In Chesapeake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Lafayette.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lafayette at 12% compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chesapeake at 7%, compared to 5% in Lafayette.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lafayette and Chesapeake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lafayette | Chesapeake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 10.0% |
Depression | 25.4% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 18.9% | 14.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 34.2% | 36.1% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lafayette vs Chesapeake
- More residents in Lafayette report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.9% in Chesapeake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lafayette at 25.4% compared to 20.9% in Chesapeake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lafayette at 18.9% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lafayette at 17.0% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 34.2% in Lafayette.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lafayette at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lafayette | Chesapeake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (735) | 0.8% (2,039) |
High School Diploma | 18.6% (13,253) | 13.1% (33,024) |
Less than High School | 12.4% (8,844) | 7.0% (17,684) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (12,763) | 23.8% (60,160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lafayette vs Chesapeake
- A higher percentage of residents in Lafayette have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lafayette hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- More residents in Lafayette have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- In Chesapeake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 17.9% in Lafayette.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.