Demographics details for Lafayette, IN vs Broken bow, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lafayette, IN vs Broken bow, NE.
| Data | Lafayette | Broken bow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 71,402 | 3,474 |
| Median Age | 33.0 years | 41.4 years |
| Median Income | $50,674 | $49,425 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Lafayette vs Broken bow
- In Lafayette, the population is higher at 71,402, compared to 3,474 in Broken bow.
- The median age in Broken bow is higher at 41.4 years, compared to 33.0 years in Lafayette.
- Lafayette has a higher median income of $50,674 compared to $49,425 in Broken bow.
- In Broken bow, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 33.0% in Lafayette.
- Lafayette has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 11% in Broken bow.
- The unemployment rate in Lafayette is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Broken bow.
Demographics
Demographics Lafayette vs Broken bow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lafayette | Broken bow |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 2 |
| White | 72 | 88 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lafayette vs Broken bow
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lafayette at 9% compared to 2% in Broken bow.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Broken bow at 88% compared to 72% in Lafayette.
- The Asian population is larger in Lafayette at 2% compared to 0% in Broken bow.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lafayette at 12% compared to 6% in Broken bow.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lafayette at 5% compared to 4% in Broken bow.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lafayette and Broken bow at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lafayette | Broken bow |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 17.1% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 20.7% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lafayette vs Broken bow
- More residents in Lafayette report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.2% in Broken bow.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lafayette at 25.4% compared to 17.1% in Broken bow.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lafayette at 18.9% compared to 16.3% in Broken bow.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Broken bow at 20.7% compared to 17.0% in Lafayette.
- Broken bow has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 34.2% in Lafayette.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Broken bow at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Lafayette.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lafayette | Broken bow |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (735) | 1.2% (42) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (13,253) | 19.8% (689) |
| Less than High School | 12.4% (8,844) | 7.3% (253) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (12,763) | 14.7% (512) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lafayette vs Broken bow
- In Broken bow, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Lafayette.
- In Broken bow, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 18.6% in Lafayette.
- More residents in Lafayette have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 7.3% in Broken bow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lafayette hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 14.7% in Broken bow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.