Demographics details for Ladson, SC vs Spotsylvania, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ladson, SC vs Spotsylvania, VA.
| Data | Ladson | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,298 | 146,688 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $74,020 | $105,068 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Ladson vs Spotsylvania
- The population in Spotsylvania is higher at 146,688, compared to 15,298 in Ladson.
- The median age in Spotsylvania is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 34.7 years in Ladson.
- Spotsylvania has a higher median income of $105,068, compared to $74,020 in Ladson.
- In Spotsylvania, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 32.0% in Ladson.
- Ladson has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Spotsylvania.
- The unemployment rate in Ladson is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Spotsylvania.
Demographics
Demographics Ladson vs Spotsylvania provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ladson | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 16 |
| White | 49 | 63 |
| Asian | 4 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ladson vs Spotsylvania
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ladson at 29% compared to 16% in Spotsylvania.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spotsylvania at 63% compared to 49% in Ladson.
- The Asian population is larger in Ladson at 4% compared to 3% in Spotsylvania.
- Spotsylvania has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 9% in Ladson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ladson at 8% compared to 7% in Spotsylvania.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ladson at 1% compared to 0% in Spotsylvania.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ladson | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 19.4% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ladson vs Spotsylvania
- More residents in Ladson report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.5% in Spotsylvania.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spotsylvania at 21.8% versus 19.4% in Ladson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ladson at 17.1% compared to 13.7% in Spotsylvania.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ladson at 19.4% compared to 17.1% in Spotsylvania.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ladson at 38.5% compared to 35.9% in Spotsylvania.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ladson at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Spotsylvania.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ladson | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (105) | 0.9% (1,297) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (2,141) | 15.5% (22,702) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (2,130) | 10.2% (14,913) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (2,065) | 21.4% (31,461) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ladson vs Spotsylvania
- In Spotsylvania, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Ladson.
- In Spotsylvania, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.5% compared to 14.0% in Ladson.
- More residents in Ladson have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 10.2% in Spotsylvania.
- In Spotsylvania, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 13.5% in Ladson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.