Demographics details for Ladson, SC vs Richmond, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ladson, SC vs Richmond, VA.
| Data | Ladson | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,298 | 229,395 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $74,020 | $59,606 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Ladson vs Richmond
- The population in Richmond is higher at 229,395, compared to 15,298 in Ladson.
- Residents in Ladson have a higher median age of 34.7 years compared to 34.5 years in Richmond.
- Ladson has a higher median income of $74,020 compared to $59,606 in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ladson at 32.0% compared to 25.0% in Richmond.
- The poverty level is higher in Richmond at 14%, compared to 10% in Ladson.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Ladson and Richmond at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Ladson vs Richmond provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ladson | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 44 |
| White | 49 | 40 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ladson vs Richmond
- In Richmond, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 44% compared to 29% in Ladson.
- Ladson has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 40% in Richmond.
- The Asian population is larger in Ladson at 4% compared to 2% in Richmond.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ladson at 9% compared to 8% in Richmond.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ladson at 8% compared to 6% in Richmond.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ladson at 1% compared to 0% in Richmond.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ladson | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 19.4% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ladson vs Richmond
- In Richmond, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.4% in Ladson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richmond at 21.4% versus 19.4% in Ladson.
- Richmond has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 17.1% in Ladson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ladson at 19.4% compared to 18.6% in Richmond.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ladson at 38.5% compared to 34.4% in Richmond.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ladson at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Richmond.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ladson | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (105) | 0.8% (1,793) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (2,141) | 11.6% (26,718) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (2,130) | 10.4% (23,891) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (2,065) | 31.0% (70,999) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ladson vs Richmond
- In Richmond, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Ladson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ladson hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 11.6% in Richmond.
- More residents in Ladson have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 10.4% in Richmond.
- In Richmond, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 13.5% in Ladson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.