Demographics details for Ladson, SC vs Lexington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ladson, SC vs Lexington, NC.
| Data | Ladson | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,298 | 19,679 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $74,020 | $36,868 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Ladson vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 19,679, compared to 15,298 in Ladson.
- The median age in Lexington is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 34.7 years in Ladson.
- Ladson has a higher median income of $74,020 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ladson at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 10% in Ladson.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Ladson.
Demographics
Demographics Ladson vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ladson | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 31 |
| White | 49 | 38 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ladson vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 29% in Ladson.
- Ladson has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- Both Ladson and Lexington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 9% in Ladson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 8% in Ladson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ladson at 1% compared to 0% in Lexington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ladson | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 19.4% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ladson vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.4% in Ladson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 25.0% versus 19.4% in Ladson.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 17.1% in Ladson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ladson at 19.4% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 38.5% in Ladson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Ladson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ladson | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (105) | 2.7% (531) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (2,141) | 17.0% (3,355) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (2,130) | 25.6% (5,036) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (2,065) | 10.2% (2,009) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ladson vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.7% in Ladson.
- In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Ladson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 25.6%, compared to 13.9% in Ladson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ladson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.