Demographics details for Ladson, SC vs Heber springs, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ladson, SC vs Heber springs, AR.
Data | Ladson | Heber springs |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,298 | 7,201 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 43.1 years |
Median Income | $74,020 | $50,472 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Ladson vs Heber springs
- In Ladson, the population is higher at 15,298, compared to 7,201 in Heber springs.
- The median age in Heber springs is higher at 43.1 years, compared to 34.7 years in Ladson.
- Ladson has a higher median income of $74,020 compared to $50,472 in Heber springs.
- In Heber springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 32.0% in Ladson.
- The poverty level is higher in Heber springs at 12%, compared to 10% in Ladson.
- Heber springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Ladson.
Demographics
Demographics Ladson vs Heber springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ladson | Heber springs |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 1 |
White | 49 | 92 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 9 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ladson vs Heber springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ladson at 29% compared to 1% in Heber springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Heber springs at 92% compared to 49% in Ladson.
- The Asian population is larger in Ladson at 4% compared to 0% in Heber springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ladson at 9% compared to 3% in Heber springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ladson at 8% compared to 3% in Heber springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ladson and Heber springs at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ladson | Heber springs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 12.5% |
Depression | 19.4% | 26.3% |
Smoking | 17.1% | 20.5% |
Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 36.2% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ladson vs Heber springs
- In Heber springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.4% in Ladson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Heber springs at 26.3% versus 19.4% in Ladson.
- Heber springs has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 17.1% in Ladson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ladson at 19.4% compared to 16.2% in Heber springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ladson at 38.5% compared to 36.2% in Heber springs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Heber springs at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Ladson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ladson | Heber springs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (105) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.0% (2,141) | 23.5% (1,694) |
Less than High School | 13.9% (2,130) | 15.1% (1,088) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (2,065) | 10.5% (756) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ladson vs Heber springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Ladson have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Heber springs.
- In Heber springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 14.0% in Ladson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Heber springs at 15.1%, compared to 13.9% in Ladson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ladson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 10.5% in Heber springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.