Demographics details for Ladson, SC vs Clayton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ladson, SC vs Clayton, OH.
| Data | Ladson | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,298 | 13,235 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $74,020 | $89,282 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Ladson vs Clayton
- In Ladson, the population is higher at 15,298, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 34.7 years in Ladson.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282, compared to $74,020 in Ladson.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 32.0% in Ladson.
- The poverty level is identical in both Ladson and Clayton at 10%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Ladson and Clayton at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Ladson vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ladson | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 30 |
| White | 49 | 61 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ladson vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 29% in Ladson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 61% compared to 49% in Ladson.
- The Asian population is larger in Ladson at 4% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ladson at 9% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ladson at 8% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ladson at 1% compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ladson | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 19.4% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ladson vs Clayton
- More residents in Ladson report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.8% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 24.4% versus 19.4% in Ladson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ladson at 17.1% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ladson at 19.4% compared to 18.9% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ladson at 38.5% compared to 37.4% in Clayton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ladson at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ladson | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (105) | 0.2% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (2,141) | 17.9% (2,371) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (2,130) | 5.6% (746) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (2,065) | 26.3% (3,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ladson vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Ladson have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 14.0% in Ladson.
- More residents in Ladson have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 13.5% in Ladson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.