Demographics details for Laconia, NH vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laconia, NH vs Trumann, AR.
| Data | Laconia | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,086 | 7,305 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $67,856 | $37,618 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Laconia vs Trumann
- In Laconia, the population is higher at 17,086, compared to 7,305 in Trumann.
- Residents in Laconia have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 40.0 years in Trumann.
- Laconia has a higher median income of $67,856 compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Laconia at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in Trumann.
- The poverty level is higher in Trumann at 13%, compared to 9% in Laconia.
- Trumann has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.4% in Laconia.
Demographics
Demographics Laconia vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laconia | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 93 | 84 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Laconia vs Trumann
- In Trumann, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Laconia.
- Laconia has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 84% in Trumann.
- The Asian population is larger in Laconia at 1% compared to 0% in Trumann.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Laconia and Trumann at 3%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Trumann at 8%, compared to 2% in Laconia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Laconia and Trumann at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laconia | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 44.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laconia vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.9% in Laconia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trumann at 28.5% versus 24.9% in Laconia.
- Trumann has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 17.2% in Laconia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Laconia at 16.6% compared to 14.4% in Trumann.
- Trumann has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 31.5% in Laconia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 18.0% in Laconia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laconia | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (61) | 1.8% (135) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (3,229) | 25.9% (1,895) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (2,158) | 24.4% (1,780) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (3,364) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laconia vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.4% in Laconia.
- In Trumann, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 18.9% in Laconia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Trumann at 24.4%, compared to 12.6% in Laconia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laconia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.