Demographics details for Laconia, NH vs Sulphur springs, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laconia, NH vs Sulphur springs, TX.
| Data | Laconia | Sulphur springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,086 | 16,408 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $67,856 | $54,950 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Laconia vs Sulphur springs
- In Laconia, the population is higher at 17,086, compared to 16,408 in Sulphur springs.
- Residents in Laconia have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 39.4 years in Sulphur springs.
- Laconia has a higher median income of $67,856 compared to $54,950 in Sulphur springs.
- In Sulphur springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Laconia.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur springs at 15%, compared to 9% in Laconia.
- Sulphur springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.4% in Laconia.
Demographics
Demographics Laconia vs Sulphur springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laconia | Sulphur springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 14 |
| White | 93 | 63 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Laconia vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 1% in Laconia.
- Laconia has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 63% in Sulphur springs.
- Both Laconia and Sulphur springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Sulphur springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 3% in Laconia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sulphur springs at 5%, compared to 2% in Laconia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Laconia and Sulphur springs at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laconia | Sulphur springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laconia vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.9% in Laconia.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laconia at 24.9% compared to 24.8% in Sulphur springs.
- Sulphur springs has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 17.2% in Laconia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 16.6% in Laconia.
- Sulphur springs has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 31.5% in Laconia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Laconia at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Sulphur springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laconia | Sulphur springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (61) | 0.8% (127) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (3,229) | 18.3% (3,003) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (2,158) | 16.0% (2,628) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (3,364) | 13.7% (2,248) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laconia vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Laconia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laconia hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 18.3% in Sulphur springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur springs at 16.0%, compared to 12.6% in Laconia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laconia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.