Demographics details for Laconia, NH vs Safford, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laconia, NH vs Safford, AZ.
| Data | Laconia | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,086 | 10,297 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 31.6 years |
| Median Income | $67,856 | $64,860 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Laconia vs Safford
- In Laconia, the population is higher at 17,086, compared to 10,297 in Safford.
- Residents in Laconia have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Laconia has a higher median income of $67,856 compared to $64,860 in Safford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Laconia at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Safford.
- Laconia has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Safford.
- Safford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.4% in Laconia.
Demographics
Demographics Laconia vs Safford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laconia | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 93 | 31 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Laconia vs Safford
- In Safford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Laconia.
- Laconia has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 31% in Safford.
- Both Laconia and Safford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Safford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 3% in Laconia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Safford at 15%, compared to 2% in Laconia.
- In Safford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Laconia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laconia | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 35.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laconia vs Safford
- In Safford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Laconia.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laconia at 24.9% compared to 19.9% in Safford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laconia at 17.2% compared to 16.6% in Safford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Safford at 17.0% compared to 16.6% in Laconia.
- Safford has higher obesity rates at 35.2% compared to 31.5% in Laconia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Laconia at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Safford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laconia | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (61) | 2.7% (274) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (3,229) | 11.1% (1,147) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (2,158) | 17.7% (1,825) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (3,364) | 10.6% (1,092) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laconia vs Safford
- In Safford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.4% in Laconia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laconia hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Safford at 17.7%, compared to 12.6% in Laconia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laconia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.