Demographics details for Laconia, NH vs Norway, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laconia, NH vs Norway, IA.
| Data | Laconia | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,086 | 466 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 48.3 years |
| Median Income | $67,856 | $90,000 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Laconia vs Norway
- In Laconia, the population is higher at 17,086, compared to 466 in Norway.
- The median age in Norway is higher at 48.3 years, compared to 43.7 years in Laconia.
- Norway has a higher median income of $90,000, compared to $67,856 in Laconia.
- In Norway, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 37.0% in Laconia.
- Laconia has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Norway.
- Norway has a higher unemployment rate at 2.5% compared to 2.4% in Laconia.
Demographics
Demographics Laconia vs Norway provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laconia | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 93 | 100 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Laconia vs Norway
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Laconia at 1% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norway at 100% compared to 93% in Laconia.
- The Asian population is larger in Laconia at 1% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Laconia at 3% compared to 0% in Norway.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Laconia at 2% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Laconia and Norway at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laconia | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 14.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 22.9% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laconia vs Norway
- More residents in Laconia report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.2% in Norway.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laconia at 24.9% compared to 17.5% in Norway.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laconia at 17.2% compared to 14.7% in Norway.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norway at 22.9% compared to 16.6% in Laconia.
- Norway has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 31.5% in Laconia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Laconia at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Norway.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laconia | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (61) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (3,229) | 33.5% (156) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (2,158) | 5.6% (26) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (3,364) | 10.5% (49) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laconia vs Norway
- A higher percentage of residents in Laconia have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- In Norway, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.5% compared to 18.9% in Laconia.
- More residents in Laconia have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 5.6% in Norway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laconia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 10.5% in Norway.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.