Demographics details for Laconia, NH vs Mountain home, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Laconia, NH vs Mountain home, AR.

Data Laconia Mountain home
Population 17,086 13,150
Median Age 43.7 years 41.8 years
Median Income $67,856 $42,281
Married Families 37.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 9% 14%
Unemployment Rate 2.4 3.5

Population Comparison: Laconia vs Mountain home

  • In Laconia, the population is higher at 17,086, compared to 13,150 in Mountain home.
  • Residents in Laconia have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 41.8 years in Mountain home.
  • Laconia has a higher median income of $67,856 compared to $42,281 in Mountain home.
  • In Mountain home, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Laconia.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mountain home at 14%, compared to 9% in Laconia.
  • Mountain home has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.4% in Laconia.

Demographics

Demographics Laconia vs Mountain home provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Laconia Mountain home
Black 1 Data is updating
White 93 90
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 3 4
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Laconia vs Mountain home

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Laconia at 1% compared to 0% in Mountain home.
  • Laconia has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 90% in Mountain home.
  • Both Laconia and Mountain home have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Mountain home has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Laconia.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mountain home at 4%, compared to 2% in Laconia.
  • In Mountain home, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Laconia.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Laconia Mountain home
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 12.9%
Depression 24.9% 28.5%
Smoking 17.2% 21.1%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 16.3%
Obesity 31.5% 34.3%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Laconia vs Mountain home

  • In Mountain home, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.9% in Laconia.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mountain home at 28.5% versus 24.9% in Laconia.
  • Mountain home has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 17.2% in Laconia.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Laconia at 16.6% compared to 16.3% in Mountain home.
  • Mountain home has higher obesity rates at 34.3% compared to 31.5% in Laconia.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mountain home at 22.0% compared to 18.0% in Laconia.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Laconia Mountain home
No Schooling 0.4% (61) 0.7% (87)
High School Diploma 18.9% (3,229) 16.9% (2,225)
Less than High School 12.6% (2,158) 14.2% (1,870)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.7% (3,364) 15.0% (1,973)

Education Levels Comparison: Laconia vs Mountain home

  • In Mountain home, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Laconia.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Laconia hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 16.9% in Mountain home.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mountain home at 14.2%, compared to 12.6% in Laconia.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Laconia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 15.0% in Mountain home.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.